|
- Why is $1 i$ equal to $-i$? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
11 There are multiple ways of writing out a given complex number, or a number in general Usually we reduce things to the "simplest" terms for display -- saying $0$ is a lot cleaner than saying $1-1$ for example The complex numbers are a field This means that every non-$0$ element has a multiplicative inverse, and that inverse is unique
- Formal proof for $ (-1) \times (-1) = 1$ - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Is there a formal proof for $(-1) \\times (-1) = 1$? It's a fundamental formula not only in arithmetic but also in the whole of math Is there a proof for it or is it just assumed?
- Word，插入多级列表，但是改了1. 1，第二章的2. 1也变成1. 1，随着改变而改变，这种情况怎么处? - 知乎
注1：【】代表软件中的功能文字 注2：同一台电脑，只需要设置一次，以后都可以直接使用 注3：如果觉得原先设置的格式不是自己想要的，可以继续点击【多级列表】——【定义新多级列表】，找到相应的位置进行修改
- What is the value of $1^i$? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
There are infinitely many possible values for $1^i$, corresponding to different branches of the complex logarithm The confusing point here is that the formula $1^x = 1$ is not part of the definition of complex exponentiation, although it is an immediate consequence of the definition of natural number exponentiation
- 知乎 - 有问题，就会有答案
知乎，中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台，于 2011 年 1 月正式上线，以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解，找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。
- abstract algebra - Prove that 1+1=2 - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Possible Duplicate: How do I convince someone that $1+1=2$ may not necessarily be true? I once read that some mathematicians provided a very length proof of $1+1=2$ Can you think of some way to
- If $A A^{-1} = I$, does that automatically imply $A^{-1} A = I$?
A -1 A means that first we apply A transformation then we apply A -1 transformation When we apply A transformation we reach some plane having some different basis vectors but after apply A -1 we again reach to the plane have basis i ^ (0,1) and j ^ (1,0)
- factorial - Why does 0! = 1? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Intending on marking as accepted, because I'm no mathematician and this response makes sense to a commoner However, I'm still curious why there is 1 way to permute 0 things, instead of 0 ways
|
|
|