|
- Use http status 202 for asynchronous operations - Stack Overflow
I think that your solution is fine, the Http status 202 is the proper response to use in this specific case indicating that the request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has not been completed
- HTTP Status code 202 vs 200 for a POST request - Stack Overflow
The main purpose of using 202 instead of 200 is for a server to communicate to a client: "From what I can tell, the request looks good However, we haven't fully dealt with your request yet and we aren't 100% certain it's going to succeed" So if someone does a request, the server immediately responds and then forwards the request elsewhere, a 202 makes sense to me If the request fails at the
- Newest Questions - Stack Overflow
Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams Try Teams for free Explore Teams
- HTTP status code for update and delete? - Stack Overflow
For a DELETE request: HTTP 200 or HTTP 204 should imply "resource deleted successfully" HTTP 202 can also be returned by either operation and would imply that the instruction was accepted by the server, but not fully applied yet It's possible that the operation fails later, so the client shouldn't fully assume that it was success
- HTTP Status 202 - how to provide information about async request . . .
What is the appropriate way of giving an estimate for request completion when the server returns a 202 - Accepted status code for asynchronous requests? From the HTTP spec (italics added by me): 202
- How can I display an RTSP video stream in a web page?
I have been exploring this possibility too with my multiple RTSP cameras, and don't want any ActiveX controls I'd like to build a custom web server which the web page continuously retrieves a JPEG image to display on the web page This way it can be supported in browsers such as Safari and viewed on an iPhone
- Is it wrong to return 202 Accepted in response to HTTP GET?
Otherwise, a 202 "Accepted" status code is returned, and the client must poll the resource until the final representation is available The reason for this behavior is the following: If a result is available within a few seconds, it needs to be retrieved as soon as possible; otherwise, when it becomes available is not important
- Is the use of Location header in HTTP 202 response RFC-compliant?
Return HTTP status code 202 (Accepted) to indicate the request was accepted for processing but is not completed You should expose an endpoint that returns the status of an asynchronous request, so the client can monitor the status by polling the status endpoint Include the URI of the status endpoint in the Location header of the 202 response
|
|
|