|
- aop - Java Aspect-Oriented Programming with Annotations - Stack Overflow
Yes, AOP should be annotation-based in the world of Java, however you can't process aspect-related annotations like regular (metadata) annotations To intercept a tagged method call and "weave" advice methods before after it, you need the help of some very nifty AOP-centric engines such as AspectJ
- java - Spring AOP vs AspectJ - Stack Overflow
Spring-AOP Pros It is simpler to use than AspectJ, since you don't have to use LTW (load-time weaving) or the AspectJ compiler It uses the Proxy pattern and the Decorator pattern Spring-AOP Cons This is proxy-based AOP, so basically you can only use method-execution joinpoints Aspects aren't applied when calling another method within the same class There can be a little runtime overhead
- What is the best implementation for AOP in . Net? [closed]
AOP is the next level of abstraction In fact, it's the limitation of inheritance and composition that lead to AOP Have you seen Entlib exception block? Aspect is a lot cleaner than invoking that damn block for every single call into the database, just to try-catch-log-throw
- Spring AOP not working for method call inside another method
Spring AOP framework is "proxy" based, the documentation at Understanding AOP Proxies explains it very well When Spring constructs a bean that is configured with an aspect (like "ABC" in your example), it actually creates a "proxy" object that acts like the real bean
- AOP Triggering Twice with @Autowired or Constructor Injection in Spring . . .
On top of that, your Spring configuration explicitly instantiates the native aspect as a Spring @Bean, probably to somehow trick Spring into supporting auto-wiring By doing these both things, your aspect now in a way exists twice: as a native AspectJ aspect and as a Spring AOP aspect or at least a Spring component This is wrong
- Is using Spring AOP for logging a good idea? - Stack Overflow
I used Spring AOP for implementing logging so I share my observations: Performance impact is not sufficient, it is less than impact of logging itself Having aspects configured in Spring configuration, you are able to completely disable logging code if necessary Debugging becomes more problematic as stack traces become rather longer Such decision sufficiently affects design It is not only that
- What Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) libraries for . NET are still . . .
From the above list I gather that the only real options for doing AOP on NET is PostSharp (even though it's a commercial product), Spring NET, Microsoft's Policy Injection Application Block, or perhaps Windsor Did I forget any major option? See also the question Suggestions for open source aspect-oriented library for C# here on StackOverflow
|
|
|