|
- 你们说的ABI，Application Binary Interface到底是什么东西？
那么当人们提到 ABI 的时候，到底在说什么？ 以我个人的经验来看，当人们提及 ABI 时，一般主要是在说 Binary-compatible 即二进制兼容性。
- What is an application binary interface (ABI)? - Stack Overflow
An ABI isn't necessarily something you will explicitly provide unless you are doing very low-level systems design work It isn't language-specific either, since (for example) a C application and a Pascal application can use the same ABI after they are compiled
- Difference between API and ABI - Stack Overflow
Definition of ABI: Whereas an API defines a source interface, an ABI defines the low-level binary interface between two or more pieces of software on a particular architecture It defines how an application interacts with itself, how an application interacts with the kernel, and how an application interacts with libraries
- What are the purposes of the ARM ABI and EABI? - Stack Overflow
An ABI (Application Binary Interface) is a standard that defines a mapping between low-level concepts in high-level languages and the abilities of a specific hardware OS platform's machine code
- Does C have a standard ABI? - Stack Overflow
An ABI is a mapping from the execution model of the language to a particular machine operating system compiler combination It makes no sense to define one in the language specification because that runs the risk of excluding C implementations on some architectures
- Please explain the C++ ABI - Stack Overflow
The common explanation for not fixing some issues with C++ is that it would break the ABI and require recompilation, but on the other hand I encounter statements like this: Honestly, this is true
- c++ - GCC ABI compatibility - Stack Overflow
Binary incompatibility notice! The C and C++ ABI changed in GCC 4 7 0, which means in general you can't link together binaries compiled with this version of the compiler and with versions before GCC 4 7 0 In particular: The option -mms-bitfields is enabled by default, which means the bitfield layout follows the convention of the Microsoft
- Cant Install lme4 Package in R (Version 2023. 12. 1+402)
This is a case where your Matrix package is too old The version number you give in the title is an RStudio version number, which isn't useful here If possible you should update the Matrix package to 1 7 0 However, you can only do this if you're running R version 4 4 Otherwise, you should reinstall lme4 from source, or from a repository with a consistently built binary Matrix lme4 stack
|
|
|