|
- What does atomic mean in programming? - Stack Overflow
In the Effective Java book, it states: The language specification guarantees that reading or writing a variable is atomic unless the variable is of type long or double [JLS, 17 4 7] What do
- c++ - How to implement an atomic counter - Stack Overflow
Fortunately, the value initializing constructor of an integral atomic is constexpr, so the above leads to constant initialization Otherwise you'd want to make it -say- a static member of a class that is wrapping this and put the initialization somewhere else
- c++ - What exactly is std::atomic? - Stack Overflow
Objects of atomic types are the only C++ objects that are free from data races; that is, if one thread writes to an atomic object while another thread reads from it, the behavior is well-defined In addition, accesses to atomic objects may establish inter-thread synchronization and order non-atomic memory accesses as specified by std::memory_order
- Is there a difference between the _Atomic type qualifier and type . . .
Why the standard make that difference? It seems as both designate, in the same way, an atomic type
- What is the difference between std::shared_ptr and std::atomic lt;std . . .
The atomic "thing" in shared_ptr is not the shared pointer itself, but the control block it points to meaning that as long as you don't mutate the shared_ptr across multiple threads, you are ok do note that copying a shared_ptr only mutates the control block, and not the shared_ptr itself
- sql - What is atomicity in dbms - Stack Overflow
The definition of atomic is hazy; a value that is atomic in one application could be non-atomic in another For a general guideline, a value is non-atomic if the application deals with only a part of the value Eg: The current Wikipedia article on First NF (Normal Form) section Atomicity actually quotes from the introductory parts above
- How to initialize a static std::atomic data member
0 Since std::atomic_init has been deprecated in C++20, here is a reimplementation which does not raise deprecation warnings, if you for some reason want to keep doing this
- When do I really need to use atomic lt;bool gt; instead of bool?
You need atomic<bool> to avoid race-conditions A race-condition occurs if two threads access the same memory location, and at least one of them is a write operation If your program contains race-conditions, the behavior is undefined
|
|
|