|
- Difference between try-finally and try-catch - Stack Overflow
Within the catch block you can respond to the thrown exception This block is executed only if there is an unhandled exception and the type matches the one or is subclass of the one specified in the catch block's parameter Finally will be always executed after try and catch blocks whether there is an exception raised or not
- c# - Why arent variables declared in try in scope in catch or . . .
Agreed; "}" means end-of-scope However, try-catch-finally is unusual in that after a try block, you must have a catch and or finally block; thus, an exception to the normal rule where the scope of a try block carried into the associated catch finally might seem acceptable?
- Does it make sense to do try-finally without catch?
@barth When there's no catch block the exception thrown in finally will be executed before any exception in the try block So If there are two exceptions one in try and one in finally the only exception that will be thrown is the one in finally
- Is it possible in Java to catch two exceptions in the same catch block . . .
For Java 7 you can have multiple Exception caught on one catch block: catch (IOException|SQLException ex) { logger log(ex); throw ex; } Documentation: In Java SE 7 and later, a single catch block can handle more than one type of exception This feature can reduce code duplication and lessen the temptation to catch an overly broad exception
- sql server - sql try catch rollback commit - preventing erroneous . . .
I am trying to write an MS sql script that has a transaction and a try catch block If it catches an exception, the transaction is rolled back If not, the transaction is committed I have seen
- Can I catch multiple Java exceptions in the same catch clause?
NoSuchFieldException e) { someCode(); } Remember, though, that if all the exceptions belong to the same class hierarchy, you can simply catch that base exception type Also note that you cannot catch both ExceptionA and ExceptionB in the same block if ExceptionB is inherited, either directly or indirectly, from ExceptionA The compiler will
- What is the advantage of using try {} catch {} versus if {} else {}
Try Catch is an actual exception handling mechanism - so if you change your exceptions, it will automatically work on all try catch statements Try Catch gives the opportunity to run code even in the case of a major exception that might kill the if else and in addition, the try statement can be rolled back (if you're savvy)
- c# - Catch multiple exceptions at once? - Stack Overflow
Is there a way to catch both exceptions and only set WebId = Guid Empty once? The given example is rather simple, as it's only a GUID, but imagine code where you modify an object multiple times, and if one of the manipulations fails as expected, you want to "reset" the object
|
|
|