|
- What is the difference between compile code and executable code?
Compiling is the act of turning source code into object code Linking is the act of combining object code with libraries into a raw executable Building is the sequence composed of compiling and linking, with possibly other tasks such as installer creation Many compilers handle the linking step automatically after compiling source code
- How does the compilation linking process work? - Stack Overflow
Here is what the author there wrote: Compiling isn't quite the same as creating an executable file! Instead, creating an executable is a multistage process divided into two components: compilation and linking In reality, even if a program "compiles fine" it might not actually work because of errors during the linking phase
- build - Building vs. Compiling (Java) - Stack Overflow
43 Compiling is the act of turning source code into object code Linking is the act of combining object code with libraries into a raw executable Building is the sequence composed of compiling and linking, with possibly other tasks such as installer creation Many compilers handle the linking step automatically after compiling source code
- Using G++ to compile multiple . cpp and . h files - Stack Overflow
Now that I've separated the classes to h and cpp files do I need to use a makefile or can I still use the "g++ main cpp" command? Compiling several files at once is a poor choice if you are going to put that into the Makefile Normally in a Makefile (for GNU Make), it should suffice to write that: # "all" is the name of the default target, running "make" without params would use it all
- compiler construction - Compiling vs Transpiling - Stack Overflow
Compiling is the general term for taking source code written in one language and transforming into another Transpiling is a specific term for taking source code written in one language and transforming into another language that has a similar level of abstraction I understand what Abstraction is
- c++ - Build or compile - Stack Overflow
Compiling just takes the source files and their included header files and generates an object file for each source file Building also links these files together to create your executable So if you change a source file, you need to build if you want a new executable to test Compiling will just get you part way there
- Running gccs steps manually, compiling, assembling, linking
As I understand, gcc performs compiling, assembling then linking The latter two steps are achieved by it running as and ld I can generate the assembly code by using gcc -S test c What would you type into a terminal, to convert the assembly code into an executable? (the reason for doing so is to learn assembly)
- compilation - Compiling a . vbproj or . csproj project file without . . .
Is there a way to compile a vbproj or csproj project file directly, just like Visual Studio does? When you compile in Visual Studio, the "output" window shows the actual call to the compiler, wh
|
|
|