- grammaticality - Can correspondences be safely used? - English . . .
As this NGram shows, plural email correspondences is so rare compared to the singular form that it's not unreasonable to say it's not used in ordinary English For the usage being examined, correspondence is a mass noun, which is why it's not normally pluralised
- correspondence with vs correspondence between
The word correspondence is defined as the exchange of letters Furthermore, if you look up the word exchange it is defined as the giving of something for something else (in this case letters) By this definition there is an exchange of letters in both sentences regardless of whether you use with or between In other words, the use of the word correspondence, by definition, already tells us that
- correspondence from A to B or correspondence between A and B
What StoneyB said From Basic Algebra II: Second Edition "If (I) is a correspondence from A to B, the inverse correspondence <I>_1 from B to A is the set of pairs (b, a) such that [blah blah] That all goes over my head, but obviously it suggests there's a domain-specific usage involved Usually (and for the purposes of ELL), we speak of correspondence between [two people things which
- Correspondence email - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
Can we say quot;correspondence email quot; or quot;email for correspondence quot;, please? I met this collocation in an invitation to a scientific conference but it sounds weird, IMHO
- what is the exact meaning of doctrine of correspondences in this . . .
what is the exact meaning of "doctrine of correspondences" in this context? That very remarkable woman, Mrs Hardinge Britten, has recorded in her "Modern American Spiritualism" how she came in close contact with the Shaker community, and was shown by them the records, taken at the time, of their spiritual visitation
- Which one is correct between chain of email and chain of emails?
What is the correct usage between "a chain of email" and "a chain of emails"? Why? By "a chain of email" I mean an email thread where many people have chimed in from time to time and that has grow
- Whats this back-and-forth, argumentative writing called?
To improve my writing and engagement in back-and-forth emails and letters that involve argument, conflict, or dispute, I want to read such writing by conscionable, principled persons (in the past or
- there was were a number of - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
My first example: (1) There were a great number of apples this year, bigger than usual I understand we cannot use " there was " here because " a great number of " is just the quantifier whereas the head noun is " apples "
|