- Humphreys Executor v. United States - Wikipedia
Over the course of the 20th century, Humphrey's Executor came to be viewed as the canonical precedent for the constitutionality of independent agencies in the U S federal government
- What is the Humphreys Executor Supreme Court decision? | AP News
After Humphrey died the next year, the person charged with administering his estate, Humphrey’s executor, sued for back pay The justices ruled unanimously that the law establishing the FTC was constitutional and that FDR’s action was improper
- Humphreys Executor: SCOTUS weighs Trumps power to fire
Read on for more about Humphrey's Executor and why the Trump administration wants it tossed: What is Humphrey's Executor? Zoom out: In 1935, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Congress had the authority to limit the president's ability to fire independent agency heads for cause That precedent formed the foundation of the administrative
- What is Humphrey’s Executor? A look at the 90-year-old Supreme Court . . .
After Humphrey died the next year, the person charged with administering his estate, Humphrey’s executor, sued for back pay The justices ruled unanimously that the law establishing the FTC was constitutional and that FDR’s action was improper
- Humphrey’s Executor v. US - Teaching American History
In 1934, Franklin D Roosevelt removed William Humphrey, a Hoover appointee, who had been critical of the New Deal and with whom Roosevelt held deep differences over what constituted fair and unfair trade After Humphrey’s death in 1934, his executor sued to recover his salary
- Supreme Court to hear major test of presidential power over Trumps . . .
In its 1935 decision in Humphrey's Executor, the Supreme Court recognized an exception to the president's removal power for multi-member agencies with quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial powers
- SCOTUS appears ready to give Trump greater firing powers, over sharp . . .
Humphrey’s Executor, Sauer said, is an “indefensible outlier” that has led to a “headless fourth branch” of independent agencies “Democratic accountability,” he argued, requires that the president, as head of the executive branch, be allowed to fire Slaughter for any reason — or no reason at all
- What to know about Humphreys Executor, legal hurdle to Trump firings - MSN
Legal scholars, and the justices of the Supreme Court, have long been deeply divided on the constitutionality of Humphrey's Executor, and to which agencies it applies
|