|
- Is evidence countable? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
The weight of evidence; two cans of coffee, 3 loaves of bread 4 bottles of wine, and so on The containers are countable but not the contents The ' weights of evidence' would be wrong because 'evidence' is an abstract concept We can't touch 'evidence' but 'types of evidence' such as hair samples, photographs, documents are countable
- Another evidence - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
This is because evidence is a non-count noun, so you can't talk about "an evidence" or "another evidence" This was previously addressed in the question, "Is 'evidence' countable?" You could talk about "more evidence" or "further evidence" to avoid the wordier (but just as correct) "another piece of evidence"
- Evidenced in or by? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
Evidenced Be or show evidence of: 'The quality of the bracelet, as evidenced by the workmanship, is exceptional' The thing that is being achieved in your sample sentence is the evidencing of the "ability to collaborate with people from culturally diverse backgrounds", the means of achieving it is the "success in the US, Europe and Asia "
- As evidenced by or as evident by? - English Language Usage Stack . . .
Evidence can be a verb; whether it is too archaic to use is a personal view Evident cannot be, so as evident by is wrong, possibly an eggcorn
- american english - Is evidence as a verb an Americanism? - English . . .
But when evidence is "correctly" used as a verb, it has the sense of establish by evidence, to make evident, demonstrate, prove By most people's standards, OP's cited usage is simply "incorrect", since it's obviously being used there with the intended meaning ratify, validate (by signing the relevant forms documentation)
- Can evidence be used as verb? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
Is it fine to used evidence as verb? For eg the study evidenced that If not, what other better word can be used in the place of evidence as a verb? Note: I find evidence can be used as a ve
- Will vs is going to for predictions, what is considered an evidence?
So I know we use is going to for predictions with evidence, and will for predictions without evidence, but I've read some examples that made me very confused about what evidence actually means Ta
- There is not evidence vs. There is not any evidence vs. There is no . . .
There "is not" evidence Reading this you should make a pause between not and evidence or emphasize "is not" Like There isn't evidence e g There is not given evidence Either you refer to the presence of nothing or the absence of something that might be evidence In "normal" word order this sounds queer but is more clearly
|
|
|