|
- Another evidence - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
This is because evidence is a non-count noun, so you can't talk about "an evidence" or "another evidence" This was previously addressed in the question, "Is 'evidence' countable?" You could talk about "more evidence" or "further evidence" to avoid the wordier (but just as correct) "another piece of evidence"
- Is evidence countable? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
The weight of evidence; two cans of coffee, 3 loaves of bread 4 bottles of wine, and so on The containers are countable but not the contents The ' weights of evidence' would be wrong because 'evidence' is an abstract concept We can't touch 'evidence' but 'types of evidence' such as hair samples, photographs, documents are countable
- Evidenced in or by? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
Evidenced Be or show evidence of: 'The quality of the bracelet, as evidenced by the workmanship, is exceptional' The thing that is being achieved in your sample sentence is the evidencing of the "ability to collaborate with people from culturally diverse backgrounds", the means of achieving it is the "success in the US, Europe and Asia "
- As evidenced by or as evident by? - English Language Usage Stack . . .
Evidence can be a verb; whether it is too archaic to use is a personal view Evident cannot be, so as evident by is wrong, possibly an eggcorn
- A verb that means “to prove someone is guilty of a crime”
Questions If “to frame” someone is to plant evidence that ‘proves’ an innocent person is guilty, is there a verb that means: to find evidence that unequivocally proves a person is guilty? Perhaps there is an obscure legal term hidden in OED, or maybe an obsolete expression, which escapes me Here is my student's sentence with the blank space Lucy realized she had the proof to
- punctuation - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
I assumed you would use dots to show left-out unnecessary text in a quote, such as in The definition of used oil is "oil that is xyz" The deleted portion is non-useful text that would confus
- Letter writing: Refering to enclosed items - English Language Usage . . .
Formally, you would refer to the enclosed items in the body of your letter followed by (enclosed) and then, under the signature at the end of the letter you'd write "Enclosures (x)" where x is the number of enclosures So, you'd write: my ID card (enclosed) and after the signature: Enclosures (3) It's assumed the recipient will have the ability to differentiate between the various
- More formal way of saying: Sorry to bug you again about this, but . . .
I assume by "Sorry to bug you again about this" that you were already given help with "X", so instead of an apology, perhaps a thank you would work better: Thank you for your help with X, but we are still having problems with it and This is most likely how I would write it, an apology seems to be an admission that you feel "bad" for asking and can sound "whiny", while a thank you gives the
|
|
|