- Whats the difference between general and generic?
Generic is the opposite of specific Generic and specific refer to the identification of a fact Specific means a fact that has been specified If you ask for (specify) a pain reliever, aspirin would be a specific pain reliever, while aspirin, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and naproxen together would be generic pain relievers
- Nullable type as a generic parameter possible? - Stack Overflow
The type 'int?' must be a non-nullable value type in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method Is specifying a nullable type as a generic parameter at all possible?
- How can I pass in a func with a generic type parameter?
You can certainly define generic delegates, after all, that's exactly what Func and Action are They are treated as generic definitions, just like generic interfaces and classes are However, you cannot use generic definitions in method signatures, only parameterized generic types Quite simply you cannot do what you are trying to achieve with a delegate alone
- How do I get a class instance of generic type T? - Stack Overflow
I have a generics class, Foo<T> In a method of Foo, I want to get the class instance of type T, but I just can't call T class What is the preferred way to get around it using T class?
- c# - A generic error occurred in GDI+ - Stack Overflow
A generic error occurred in GDI+ Asked 14 years, 3 months ago Modified 10 months ago Viewed 63k times
- c# - How to compare values of generic types? - Stack Overflow
So, two questions: Why do we observe this weird behaviour? What keeps us from comparing the values of generic types which are known to be IComparable? Doesn't it somehow defeat the entire purpose of generic constraints? How do I resolve this, or at least work around it?
- Using a using alias = class with generic types? [duplicate]
using LookupDictionary = System Collections Generic Dictionary<string, int>; Now I want to accomplish the same with a generic type, while preserving it as a generic type:
- Generics in C#, using type of a variable as parameter
The point about generic types, is that although you may not know them at "coding time", the compiler needs to be able to resolve them at compile time Why? Because under the hood, the compiler will go away and create a new type (sometimes called a closed generic type) for each different usage of the "open" generic type
|