|
- statistics - What are differences between Geometric, Logarithmic and . . .
Now lets do it using the geometric method that is repeated multiplication, in this case we start with x goes from 0 to 5 and our sequence goes like this: 1, 2, 2•2=4, 2•2•2=8, 2•2•2•2=16, 2•2•2•2•2=32 The conflicts have made me more confused about the concept of a dfference between Geometric and exponential growth
- Proof of geometric series formula - Mathematics Stack Exchange
So for, the above formula, how did they get (n + 1) (n + 1) a for the geometric progression when r = 1 r = 1 I also am confused where the negative a comes from in the following sequence of steps
- why geometric multiplicity is bounded by algebraic multiplicity?
The geometric multiplicity is the number of linearly independent vectors, and each vector is the solution to one algebraic eigenvector equation, so there must be at least as much algebraic multiplicity
- Does geometric realization commute with finite limits?
Does geometric realization commute with finite limits? Ask Question Asked 1 year, 3 months ago Modified 1 year, 3 months ago
- What does the dot product of two vectors represent?
21 It might help to think of multiplication of real numbers in a more geometric fashion 2 2 times 3 3 is the length of the interval you get starting with an interval of length 3 3 and then stretching the line by a factor of 2 2 For dot product, in addition to this stretching idea, you need another geometric idea, namely projection
- probability - How to get $P (X gt; x)$ where $X$ is a geometric random . . .
7 A geometric random variable describes the probability of having n n failures before the first success There are therefore two ways of looking at this: P(X> x) P (X> x) means that I have x x failures in a row; this occurs with probability (1 − p)x (1 − p) x
- Calculate expectation of a geometric random variable
2 A clever solution to find the expected value of a geometric r v is those employed in this video lecture of the MITx course "Introduction to Probability: Part 1 - The Fundamentals" (by the way, an extremely enjoyable course) and based on (a) the memoryless property of the geometric r v and (b) the total expectation theorem
- terminology - Is it more accurate to use the term Geometric Growth or . . .
For example, there is a Geometric Progression but no Exponential Progression article on Wikipedia, so perhaps the term Geometric is a bit more accurate, mathematically speaking? Why are there two terms for this type of growth? Perhaps exponential growth is more popular in common parlance, and geometric in mathematical circles?
|
|
|