|
- java - Packing SUBFIELDS using jpos api - Stack Overflow
It really depends on the content you want, for example, field 4 (amount) is usually a NUMERIC field (either IFB_NUMERIC, IFA_NUMERIC or IFE_NUMERIC depending if you want BCD, ASCII or EBCDIC encoding) whereas field 43 (card acceptor location) is typically an IF_CHAR field (or IFE_CHAR for EBCDIC encoding) –
- How to properly use Generic Packager to pack Nested TLV fields?
My ISO spec defines some fields like follows: Dataset ID + Length + TLV fields There can be many Dataset IDs in this Field 34, and each dataset ID can contain many tags, and all of the tags follow TLV format as well
- siebel - Getting error while running EIM job - Stack Overflow
Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams Try Teams for free Explore Teams
- Azure Logic Apps - SQL tables to a single Email - How To
So I missed a type of return object - BODY Resultsets: gave too much information since it looked like there was a possibility of additional tables to come back
- java - JPos - ISO8583 Messages TLV Fields - Stack Overflow
I'm constructing a simple e-purchase financial message using jpos library, i'm using a generic packager to pack my message fields, the problem occurs at field 48 which is a TLV Field
- How to send Header value in Jmeter using ISO8583 Plugin
0000 01 10 72 20 22 81 0A D0 82 02 10 XX XX XX XX XX 0010 XX XX XX 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 00 08 21 06 57 0020 20 18 45 66 08 26 00 00 00 06 44 10 03 F4 F2 F2 0030 F1 F0 F6 F1 F8 F3 F9 F8 F8 F1 F9 E3 C5 D9 D4 C9 0040 C4 F0 F1 E2 88 85 93 84 96 95 40 E2 98 A4 81 99 0050 85 40 02 F5 E8 08 26 49 01 00 46 9A 03 08 11 05 0060 9C 01 00 9F 02 06 00 00
- error packing field 61 (org. jpos. iso. ISOException: java. lang . . .
It seems you missed the 9th field in the subpackage definition Can you add it? It doesn't matter if you don't use it, the packager expects all consecutive field definition present, you can use IF_NOP if you don't need it, but it's better if you set the one fo the specs
- Why tc cannot do ingress shaping? Does ingress shaping make sense?
I found a solution called IFB(updated IMQ) can redirect the traffic to egress But it seems not a good solution because it's wasting CPU So I don't want to use this Does ingress shaping make sense? And why tc doesn't support it?
|
|
|