- www. adrforum. com
Complainant is Invesco Ltd (“Complainant”), represented by Mary Grace Gallagher of Alston Bird, LLP, Georgia, USA Respondent is Donal Leahy Capital Assets Acquisitions (“Respondent”), Ireland REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <globalinvesco com>, registered with Everyones Internet, Ltd dba SoftLayer
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
The Panel finds that this use is not abona fideoffering of goods or services under Policy ¶¶ 4 (c) (i) (iii) ”); see also Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial
- Invesco Ltd. v Terehov Maksim Olegovich
Complainant is Invesco Ltd (“Complainant”), represented by Theresa Conduah of Alston Bird LLP, North Carolina, USA Respondent is Terehov Maksim Olegovich (“Respondent”), Russia
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
See Herbalife Int’l, Inc v Farmana, D2005-0765 (WIPO Oct 3, 2005) (parking of the domain name for many years constitutes no more than a passive use or de facto activity, which activity can reinforce a finding of no legitimate interest), see also Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
Panel finds that Complainant has made a prima faciecase that Respondent lacks a right or interest in the disputed domain name (see, for example,Invesco Ltd v Premanshu RanaForumbona fide onus shifts to Respondent
- DECISION - adrforum. com
See Navistar International Corporation v N RahmanyForum <cherryind com> not <cherryind com> See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel Admission Virus(Forum bona fideSee Ripple Labs Inc v NGYEN NGOC PHUONG THAOForum bona fide see also, Invesco Ltd v Premanshu RanaForum bona fide
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (ForumJuly 10, 2017) ("Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ") The Panel finds that Complainant has satisfied Policy ¶ 4 (a) (ii)
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ”) Respondent uses the <authy app> domain to redirect consumers to a competing authenticator app
|