|
- Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old Outcomes
Combining robust empirical and computational analysis, new comprehensive datasets on investment treaties and awards, and a range of theories from law and economics to complexity science, this book proceeds in three steps
- Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old . . .
Extract If the so-called backlash to investment arbitration has a single point of origin, it might be July 31, 2001
- Introduction | Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New . . .
This introduction then presents the three parts of the book that, respectively, (1) trace state-driven change, (2) explain the arbitral backlash, and (3) suggest how to preserve and amplify state-driven reform
- Perpetuating Mistakes through Precedent | Investment Arbitration and . . .
This chapter discusses how precedent grounds the interpretation of new treaties in old case law thereby creating a final means for rolling back innovation in new-generation treaties
- Treaties as Data | Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New . . .
This chapter uses data science to empirically trace the design change of over 3,300 international investment agreements The chapter introduces computational legal scholarship that promises to scale empirical legal research
- Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old . . .
Combining robust empirical and computational analysis, new comprehensive datasets on investment treaties and awards, and a range of theories from law and economics to complexity science, this book proceeds in three steps
- Data-Driven Renegotiation | Investment Arbitration and State-Driven . . .
This chapter discusses how empirics and technology can turn renegotiation into an efficient tool to reform incomplete treaties in light of more complete ones The chapter starts by showing that investment treaty renegotiations are a missed opportunity
- Forward-Looking Interpretation | Investment Arbitration and State . . .
This chapter explores how states can use interpretation to read old treaties in light of new ones It first argues that contract theory should structure interpretive discretion of arbitral tribunals
|
|
|