|
- Past Simple and Unreal Situations in the Past
Where did you see these sentences? In a past unreal sentence I expect to see a past perfect For instance I understand the first sentence "What if Napoleon won the Battle of Waterloo?" to indicate that we don't whether Napoleon won the Battle of Waterloo, and we think it is possible that he did If I wanted to speculate on what would happen if the outcome of the battle had been different than
- A group of people + is are ? | WordReference Forums
Collecting phrases like a number of or a pair of can make it hard to choose between is and are Which verb do you use when you’re talking about a number of people? On one hand, number is singular, which calls for is But people is plural, which calls for are Typically, it’s best to use are with a number of Correct A number of people are concerned about the lack of progress Incorrect A
- members members members area | WordReference Forums
One is not necessarily correct over the others - member's area = an area of a member, belonging to a member - members' area = an area of members, belonging to more than one member - members area = an area for members That is exactly the problem I have been having so far
- confirm whether if I am correct | WordReference Forums
Could some member s confirm whether if I am correct? 1 Is the question correctly phrased? 2, If it is, should I use 'whether' or 'if'? Thanks in advance
- Difference between dedicated for dedicated to
Hi! I would like to know what's the difference between "dedicated for" "dedicated to" Could someone explain it to me please?
- member ID (insurance companies) - WordReference Forums
I sometimes interpret for calls to insurance companies At the beginning of the call the customer service representative often asks "Can you tell me your member ID?" or "What's your member ID number?" (The answer is always a string of numbers or numbers and letters ) How should I interpret those
- To be (a) part of something | WordReference Forums
What's the difference between "to be a part of something" and "to be part of something" or are they both correct and interchangeable? For example, would
- Before was was was，was was is - WordReference Forums
Robby Zhu Senior Member China - Mandarin Jun 7, 2023 #1 Greetings, 1 Before was was was, was was is 2 Before was is was, was was is Which one do you think makes more sense? I think the second, although the first gets more hits on Google, because "was" now comes as "was", so the tense should be present
|
|
|