|
- [D] Lessons from this years Neurips : r MachineLearning - Reddit
OP's post is saying that within NeurIPS this year (a very popular machine learning conference), there was a high rate (65%) of paper submissions that did not bother to post a rebuttal to reviewer's comments, or entirely withdrew from the process after getting unfavourable reviews
- [D] Differences between ML conferences : r MachineLearning - Reddit
ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML: Theoretical ML, _some_ applications but heavily NN focused in the last few years (understandably) AAAI, UAI, IJCAI: A potentially lower tier of the above with more applications KDD, TheWebConf (WWW): Application focused WSDM, SIGIR, RecSys: More specific applications (search, information retrieval, recommender systems)
- [D] Deciding to publish, but where? : r MachineLearning - Reddit
Getting an ICANN paper is easier than a NeurIPS paper, true On the other hand, getting a NeurIPS or two (same for ICML, ICLR, CVPR, ICCV, ECCV) virtually guarantees interviews for internships jobs in FAANG and top academic labs (for postdoc positions) It also almost guarantees citations
- r NeurIPS - Reddit
r NeurIPS: Subreddit for discussing the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Discussing adjacent conferences like I
- [D] NeurIPS 2023 Institutions Ranking : r MachineLearning - Reddit
Along with NeurIPS and ICLR, it is one of the three primary conferences of high impact in machine learning and artificial intelligence research " ICLR presentation spots seem quite sought-after among researchers - according to WP they received 1591 paper submissions in 2019, 24 of which were given a spot for an oral presentation
- How difficult is it to get paper accepted at NeurIPS workshops?
Regarding the A+ workshop > B conference I would say that this is very wishful I am not sure how workshop papers are regarded, but I would not expect a workshop (which have widely variable criterion for acceptance) to "count" (whatever that means) nearly as much as an established conference (even if rank B) i e I would consider a 3DV paper better than a random cvpr workshop paper
- [D] NeurIPS 2023 Paper Reviews : r MachineLearning - Reddit
There is so much noise in the reviews every year Some good work that the authors are proud of might get a low score because of the noisy system, given that NeurIPS is growing so large these years We should keep in mind that the work is still valuable no matter what the score is
- [D] Difference between AAAI, ICLR and AISTATS? : r MachineLearning - Reddit
While it used to not have a top ML reputation compared to say neurips icml, I now hear many folks think that aistats review quality surpasses neurips icml and the papers in last 5 years have been quite high-quality IMO (despite faring worse in some official rankings, I think AIStats is definitely as good as UAI which is the other statistical
|
|
|