- What to Know About United States v. Skrmetti - The New York Times
For some trans activists and their allies, the case, known as United States v Skrmetti, was the culmination of a powerful Trump-era backlash against trans people, artfully stoked by right-wing
- United States v. Skrmetti - Wikipedia
United States v Skrmetti, 605 U S ____ (2025), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that a Tennessee state law banning puberty blockers and hormone therapy for the treatment of gender dysphoria in minors did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
- United States v. Skrmetti | 605 U. S. ___ (2025) | Justia U. S . . .
United States, 323 U S 214, 216 (1944), overruled by Trump v Hawaii, 585 U S 677 (2018) The Court has also suggested that religion is a suspect class See Carolene Products, 304 U S , at 152, n 4 That determination follows from the First Amendment, which prohibits any impairment of the “free exercise” of “religion ”
- United States v. Skrmetti - SCOTUSblog
Holding: Tennessee’s law prohibiting certain medical treatments for transgender minors is not subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and satisfies rational basis review Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 18, 2025
- The Supreme Court Upholds a Ban on Gender-Affirming Care . . .
This Health Care in Motion will summarize the Skrmetti majority opinion, dis cuss the legal implications , and offer a brief forecast on future legal challenges along with other resources The Skrmetti Decision The central question before the Supreme Court was whether SB1 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
- L. W. v. Skrmetti U. S. v. Skrmetti | American Civil Liberties . . .
UPDATE: The Supreme Court of the United States has scheduled oral arguments in U S v Skrmetti, for December 4, 2024 In April 2023, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Tennessee, Lambda Legal, and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer Feld LLP sued the State of Tennessee to block the state’s ban on medically necessary gender-affirming care
- United States v. Skrmetti - fedsoc. org
These laws prohibited healthcare providers from administering puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and sex-transition surgeries to minors for the purpose of altering their appearance or validating their gender identity when inconsistent with their biological sex
|