|
- PERC Rule for Pulmonary Embolism - MDCalc
There is no need to apply the PERC rule to those patients who are not being evaluated for PE If the patient is considered low-risk, PERC may help avoid further testing If the patient is moderate or high risk then PERC can not be utilized Consider d-dimer or imaging based on risk
- Washington State Public Employment Relations Commission . . .
As the Washington State agency with jurisdiction over public sector labor relations and collective bargaining, PERC assists parties in resolving labor-management disputes
- PERC rule - UpToDate
In patients with a low probability of PE who fullfil all eight criteria, the likelihood of PE is low and no further testing is required All other patients should be considered for further testing with sensitive D-dimer or imaging
- PERC Rule in the Bedside Evaluation for Pulmonary Embolism
The PERC (Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria) rule can be used in the initial evaluation for pulmonary embolism (PE) in low-risk patients to exclude the diagnosis of PE based on historical and physical examination data alone
- PERC Rule for Pulmonary Embolism Calculator
This PERC rule calculator is used to rule out patients that are already deemed to have a low risk of pulmonary embolism to allow searching a different diagnosis
- PERC rule - WikEM
Check all of the following that are true: In patients with low suspicion for PE (best-guess pre-test probability <15%) AND all are true, only 0 9% had PE (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i e no need for d-dimer) [1] [2] Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
- PERC – The PERT Consortium™
PERC™ will standardize data collection in patients undergoing evaluation and treatment, and thus establish the foundation for an expanding evidence base that will inform future care for acute pulmonary embolism
|
|
|