- Why is cold fusion considered bogus? - Physics Stack Exchange
In the past, after Fleischmann and Pons announced their cold fusion results, in perfectly good faith, they were proven wrong by subsequent experiments What are the experimental realities that make Fleischmann and Pons style cold fusions experiments easy to get wrong? Would the same risks apply to this new set up?
- physical chemistry - Widom-Larsen Theory - Physics Stack Exchange
The renaming is simply an attempt by Cold Fusion folks to politically distance themselves from Pons and Fleischmann, and people have a name for distancing the original discoverers--- it's called "plagiarism"
- Is there any reproducible tested evidence for Ni-H cold fusion?
Palladium Deuterium cold-fusion certainly exists, as tritium was detected by Pons Fleischmann at Utah, at Bhabha, at Texas A M by two independent groups (Wolf and Bocris) and also at Los Alamos (but the fellow was not allowed to publish)
- Lorentz invariance of the 3 + 1 decomposition of spacetime
Josep M Pons, "Generally covariant theories: the Noether obstruction for realizing certain space-time diffeomorphisms in phase space " Classical and Quantum Gravity 20 (2003) 3279-3294; arXiv:gr-qc 0306035 J M Pons, D C Salisbury, L C Shepley, "Gauge transformations in the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms of generally covariant theories"
- Is Keshes technology for real? - Physics Stack Exchange
Don't believe the naysayers that say Keshe technology can't be done there are plenty who have already done it! Look up Joseph Papp, Stanley Meyer, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, as examples of some of those who have worked with plasma or LENR
- particle physics - How come neutrons in a nucleus dont decay . . .
I know outside a nucleus, neutrons are unstable and they have half life of about 15 minutes But when they are together with protons inside the nucleus, they are stable How does that happen? I go
- Should we forget fusion and focus on geothermal power?
It is clear from Pons and Fleischmann's seminal, era-defining work, that it is possible to use atomic scale chemistry to get fusion This is where the hot fusion money should have been diverted back in 1989, and some speculate that the prospect of losing money led the hot-fusion scientists to suppress Pons and Fleischmann's work
- What are the challenges to achieving cold fusion?
while this is informative, it is wrong to demand "peer review" in this case, as peer review is just censorship The stuff you link to, the "surface polaritons", the NASA stuff, the Rossi crap, this is the worst stuff in the cold fusion field There are hangers-on and frauds, the legitimate work is Pons Fleischmann, McKubre, Arata, and others related to this experimental setup It's Pd d not Ni
|