|
- verbs - The past participle of split: split or splitted . . .
The past tense, and past participle of "split" is "split" I don't think that "splitted" is grammatical, though I dare say it gets used
- What are the differences between crack, slit, crevice, split . . .
For the most part, the words are interchangeable Distinguishing between multiple examples of such things can be aided by their individual connotations: crack a line on the surface of something along which it has split without breaking into separate parts A crack tends to be a visible flaw that can splinter or spider into larger cracks with many smaller, attached cracks The defining point of
- Split in vs split into - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
In the sentence I have a bibliography page which I'd like to split in into sections which would you rather use: split in or split into? Why?
- Split in half vs. split in two — which one is correct?
Does the "in" imply multiplication, in which case split in half is correct, or is it division? It sounds like the latter to me, but I've heard it used both ways
- What are the rules for splitting words at the end of a line?
What are the rules in English language to split words at the end of a line? Where exactly must the hyphen split the word?
- Is there a word for a road path that splits specifically into three . . .
Is there a word that specifically means: an intersection in a road or path where one road is split into three? I thought of trifurcation but am trying to find something more specific to a road or path
- Are split infinitives grammatically incorrect, or are they valid . . .
Split infinitives involve the to-infinitive specifically The "to" not a "preposition"; it is a infinitive marker Lastly, I found your arguments about "wanna" "gonna" unconvincing and irrelevant because these words are informal and the argument about split infinitives is most certainly about prescriptivism
- idioms - What’s the meaning of “split wide open” - English Language . . .
If you split a rock or a log or a fruit open, you can see what is inside If you split something wide open then the inside is revealed even more The author is using a metaphor Probably it means that the knowledge the person had, was broken into fragments What they had always believed to be reality turned out not to be true
|
|
|