|
- Right way to parse chain of various binary functions with `Parsec`?
It is true that Parsec has chainl and chainr to parse chains of either left-associative or right-associative operations (i e a - gt; a - gt; a) So I could quite easily parse something like x + y
- Newest parsec Questions - Stack Overflow
It might seem that this question is a duplicate of this question, however either Parsec or the Indent library has changed since 2012 and none of the old examples I have found for the indent library
- Parsec: difference between try and lookAhead?
We can see this in action by looking at the code for Parsec directly, which is somewhat more complex than my notion of Parser above First we examine ParsecT newtype ParsecT s u m a = ParsecT {unParser :: forall b
- Parsec vs Yacc Bison Antlr: Why and when to use Parsec?
My understanding is that Parsec creates a nice DSL of writing parsers and Haskell makes it very easy and expressive But parsing is such a standard popular technology that deserves its own language, which outputs to multiple target languages So when shall we use Parsec instead of, say, generating Haskell code from Bison Antlr?
- Parsec Connection Failure Error -10 and -11 - Stack Overflow
There might be several reasons for these two errors, however the Parsec docs does not give possible solutions In my case going to App Features > Optional Features > Add Feature and then look for Media Feature Pack and install it, reboot and should work
- Simply using parsec in python - Stack Overflow
Unfortunately lambda is not suitable for building a parsec Parser this way since you need to return a parsec Value type not a boolean, so it will quickly lose its terseness The design of parsec requires a Parser to act independently on an input stream without knowledge of any other Parser To do this effectively a Parser must manage an index
- Using Parsec to parse regular expressions - Stack Overflow
You should use Parsec Expr buildExprParser; it is ideal for this purpose You simply describe your operators, their precedence and associativity, and how to parse an atom, and the combinator builds the parser for you!
- Should I use a lexer when using a parser combinator library like Parsec?
You cannot use common parsers on String anymore - e g for parsing a number with a library Function parseFloat :: Parsec String s Float (that operates on a String input stream), you have to do something like takeNextToken :: TokenParser String and execute the parseFloat parser on it, inspecting the parse result (usually Either ErrorMessage a
|
|
|