|
- Batman Forever - Wikipedia
Batman Forever is a 1995 American superhero film based on the DC Comics character Batman by Bob Kane and Bill Finger [a] It is the third installment of the Batman film series, acting as a standalone sequel to Batman Returns
- Batman Forever (1995) - IMDb
Bruce Wayne and his young ward Dick Grayson tackle crime as Batman and Robin When villains Two-Face and the Riddler team up to take over Gotham City by beating Batman, the dynamic duo find themselves in a battle for the city
- Batman Forever | Rotten Tomatoes
Batman (Val Kilmer) faces off against two foes: the schizophrenic, horribly scarred former District Attorney Harvey Dent, aka Two-Face (Tommy Lee Jones), and the Riddler (Jim Carrey), a
- Watch Batman Forever | Prime Video - amazon. com
The Caped Crusader woos a criminal psychologist, takes on a sidekick and battles Two-Face and the Riddler
- Batman Forever at 30: How the Val Kilmer Sequel Was as Much a . . . - IGN
Batman Forever at 30: How the Val Kilmer Sequel Was as Much a Studio Recalibration as a Fresh New Take on the Dark Knight Three decades after its release, Val Kilmer and Joel Schumacher's sequel
- Batman Forever (Movie) | DC Database | Fandom
Batman Forever is a 1995 superhero film directed by Joel Schumacher Intended as the sequel to Batman Returns, it depicts the eponymous hero 's attempt to stop the supervillains Two-Face and the Riddler, while also taking in a rebellious Dick Grayson as his ward
- Batman Forever | Batman Movies Wiki | Fandom
Batman Forever is a 1995 superhero film directed by Joel Schumacher and based on the DC Comics character of the same name In Gotham City, the crime fighter Batman defuses a hostage situation caused by a criminal known as Two-Face, the alter ego of the former district attorney Harvey Dent, but
- ‘Batman Forever’ Remains The Most Underrated Superhero Film Of All Time
Thirty years ago, Joel Schumacher’s Batman Forever flapped its way into theaters The film proved to be something of a conundrum, though, since it was an undisputed financial success ($330 million+) but not as warmly received by critics and fans as Tim Burton’s Batman movies Acclaimed film critic Roger Ebert summed up the sentiment well, writing, “Is the movie better entertainment? Well
|
|
|