|
- Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987 - Wikipedia
The Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987 is an Act of Parliament passed by the United Kingdom Parliament which allows the UK government to determine what land is considered to be diplomatic or consular premises
- Reassuring the Inviolability of Diplomatic Premises: Worrying Trends . . .
Article 22 of the Convention states: “The premises of the mission shall be inviolable The agents of the receiving State may not enter them, except with the consent of the head of the mission ” The inviolability of diplomatic premises, as codified in the Vienna Convention, is unqualified
- The inviolability of diplomatic and consular premises
Inviolability guarantees the sanctity of diplomatic and consular premises Whilst it does not place premises above the law, anybody who remains on diplomatic or consular premises can take refuge from the law
- Unraveling Norms of Diplomatic Immunity? The Case of Diplomatic Premises
First, there is limited evidence of Ecuador or Israel employing moral self-licensing to justify their actions in breaching the VCDR protection clause concerning diplomatic premises
- Why are embassies supposed to be inviolable? - The Economist
Article 22 states that diplomatic premises are inviolable Local police or security forces must not enter an embassy without the consent of the ambassador or mission chief
- The Gray Zone : Safeguarding Diplomatic Premises from Attacks by Third . . .
The “gray zone” which exists in international law around third party state attacks on diplomatic premises within the territory of other states promotes uncertain-ty, instability, and impunity
- What Is an Embassy Building and What Is Its Legal Status?
The legal standing of an embassy building is governed by international law, primarily the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 This treaty establishes the principle of inviolability for diplomatic premises
- Stretching the Limits of Inviolability: The Re-examination of the . . .
Firstly, the article will outline the doctrinal roots underlying the inviolability of diplomatic premises and, correspondingly, the jurisdictional implications thereof (Sect 2)
|
|
|