|
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U. S. 662 (2009) - Justia U. S. Supreme Court Center
The plausibility standard is not akin to a “probability requirement,” but it asks for more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully Ibid
- Assessing Iqbal - Harvard Law Policy Review
Assessing Iqbal Roger M Michalski Introduction In May 2009, the Supreme Court decided Ashcroft v Iqbal, which transformed federal civil litigation by abolishing notice pleading in favor of “plausibility” pleading [1] In the short time since then, Iqbal has had a profound impact on civil litigation and the enforcement of individual rights
- Plausibility Pleading After Twombly And Iqbal - Troutman
KNOW THE JUDGE'S PHILOSOPHY ON TWOMBLY AND IQBAL Given the potentially far-reaching ramifications of the decisions in Iqbal and Twombly, most (if not all) federal judges are be- ing forced to define the parameters of "plausibility " Perhaps unsurprisingly, the definition of "plausibil- ity" can greatly vary depending on the judge
- Debunking Twombly Iqbal: Plausibility is More than Plausible in Ohio . . .
Twombly Iqbal , only three— Massachusetts, Nebraska and South Dakota—have adopted the plausibility standard or something akin to it Nevada has declined to decide The remaining states have declined to shift from established basic notice pleading principles to the plausibility requirement
- Plausibility After Twombly and Iqbal? : r LawSchool - Reddit
The plausibility standard is not akin to a "probability requirement," but it asks for more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully Ibid Where a complaint pleads facts that are "merely consistent with" a defendant's liability, it "stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of `entitlement to relief '"
- Federal Pleading Practice After Iqbal
But is plausibility comparative: What’s more likely to be true? “Where a complaint pleads facts that are merely consistent with a defendant’s liability, it stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of ‘entitlement to relief’” To sum up Step 2: What is the “plausibility” test?
- Pleadings and Plausibility: ‘Iqbal at 15’ Symposium Grapples With a . . .
Aided by an interview with Iqbal himself in Lahore, Pakistan, Sinnar draws in the racial and religious overtones of Iqbal’s detention by the government, his fight for accountability for his physical abuse while in jail, and the lasting impact of being labeled a terrorist after being deported
- Revisiting Iqbal: Racial Discrimination, Plausibility Standards, and . . .
The Iqbal decision’s impact is felt throughout any form of litigation, particularly the “plausibility” standard it announced that makes it harder for plaintiffs to even reach the discovery phase in litigation
|
|
|