|
- How to generate a random int in C? - Stack Overflow
Many implementations of rand() cycle through a short list of numbers, and the low bits have shorter cycles The way that some programs call rand() is awful, and calculating a good seed to pass to srand() is hard The best way to generate random numbers in C is to use a third-party library like OpenSSL For example,
- What difference between rand () and random () functions?
9 Functions rand() and random() are either defined by POSIX since at least POSIX 1-2001 (and randomize() is not standardized) On older rand() implementations, and on current implementations on different systems, the lower-order bits are much less random than the higher-order bits When available, random() does not suffer of this issue
- c++ - How does modulus and rand () work? - Stack Overflow
A second lesson is that this shows another way in which <random> is easier to use than rand() and manually computing your own distributions The built-in uniform_int_distribution allows you to directly state the desired, inclusive range
- ¿Cual es la diferencia entre rand y srand?
me gustaria si me pudieran explicar bien cual es la diferencia, me confundo mucho con rand y srand, ¿cual es la diferencia? He buscado en otros sitios, pero confundo más Gracias
- Why is the use of rand() considered bad? - Stack Overflow
Usage of rand() is usually frowned upon despite using a seed via srand() Why would that be the case? What better alternatives are available?
- How does rand() work? Does it have certain tendencies? Is there . . .
The actual implementation of the random number generator is left unspecified, so the actual behavior is specific to the implementation The important thing to remember is that rand does not return random numbers; it returns pseudo-random numbers, and the values it returns are determined by the seed value and the number of times rand has been
|
|
|