- super() in Java - Stack Overflow
The super keyword can be used to call the superclass constructor and to refer to a member of the superclass When you call super() with the right arguments, we actually call the constructor Box, which initializes variables width, height and depth, referred to it by using the values of the corresponding parameters You only remains to initialize
- Understanding Python super() with __init__() methods
super() lets you avoid referring to the base class explicitly, which can be nice But the main advantage comes with multiple inheritance, where all sorts of fun stuff can happen See the standard docs on super if you haven't already It's rather hand-wavey and doesn't tell us much, but the point of super is not to avoid writing the parent
- How does Pythons super () work with multiple inheritance?
And call to super in that routine invokes init defined in First MRO=[First, Second] Now call to super in init defined in First will continue searching MRO and find init defined in Second, and any call to super will hit the default object init I hope this example clarifies the concept If you don't call super from First
- oop - What does super do in Python? - Stack Overflow
In Python 2, getting the arguments to super and the correct method arguments right can be a little confusing, so I suggest using the Python 3 only method of calling it If you know you're using super correctly with single inheritance, that makes debugging less difficult going forward Dependency Injection
- super object has no attribute __sklearn_tags__
'super' object has no attribute '__sklearn_tags__' This occurs when I invoke the fit method on the RandomizedSearchCV object I suspect it could be related to compatibility issues between Scikit-learn and XGBoost or Python version I am using Python 3 12, and both Scikit-learn and XGBoost are installed with their latest versions
- java - When do I use super ()? - Stack Overflow
That's because if you omit a call to the super constructor, the no-argument super constructor will be invoked automatically anyway Not to say that it's bad style; some people like being explicit However, where it becomes useful is when the super constructor takes arguments that you want to pass in from the subclass
- coding style - Using super in C++ - Stack Overflow
@user2623967 : Right In the case of simple inheritance, one "super" is enough Now, if you have multiple inheritance, having "superA", "superB", etc is a good solution: You WANT to call the method from one implementation or another, so you must TELL what implementation you want
- python - Using super with a class method - Stack Overflow
Since super(cls, cls) do_your_stuff() is called inside B do_your_stuff, you end up calling B do_your_stuff in an infinite loop In Python3, the 0-argument form of super was added so super(B, cls) could be replaced by super(), and Python3 will figure out from context that super() in the definition of class B should be equivalent to super(B, cls)
|