|
- I am going to attend vs I am attending - English Language Usage . . .
Which of these two statements seems to be more appropriate? I am attending a meeting tomorrow I am going to attend a meeting tomorrow I am quite not sure which one to use
- Why is what will you do tomorrow evening incorrect?
" What are you doing tomorrow? " is a question that asks the listener what plans they have already made for tomorrow It is passive, and is merely asking for information from the listener " What will you do tomorrow? " is a question that asks the listener to make a decision about what to do tomorrow This question is more active
- Wait for tomorrow wait until tomorrow - English Language Learners . . .
Wait for tomorrow suggests that tomorrow will bring some important development or surprise Wait until tomorrow is a more prosaic statement that means just what it says
- tense - Have vs. Will have vs. Will be having - English Language . . .
You will definitely have a test the following morning I will be having a test tomorrow morning is continuous: in the future, the event will happen for an uncertain duration If the duration is known, for instance, the simple future is the most logical: I will have a three hour meeting on Tuesday morning
- How to ask the day - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
What's tomorrow? is the most versatile as it can mean What's the date tomorrow? What day of the week is tomorrow? What's so special about tomorrow? or What are we supposed to be doing tomorrow? I suspect that that versatility alone is what makes What's What is tomorrow? the most common That, and it's informal nature of course
- phrase usage - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
Here's how I'd say it: Money transferred to your account will appear no later than the next working day or: Money transferred to your account will be available no later than the next working day I don't think there is any need to specify "we", and I think the best proposition to use with transferred in this context is to
- prepositions - Scheduled on vs scheduled for - English Language . . .
The version with on looks a little wrong to me I would use on if I were describing the time at which the schedule was set, giving something like: My interview was scheduled on the 26th of June for the 27th of June at 8:00 AM This sentence means that on the 26th, two people agreed, "let's have an interview tomorrow " The 27th is when the interview (presumably) actually took place However
- sentence construction - Today is or today *it* is? - English . . .
1 Words like "tomorrow", "today", and "yesterday" can be used as either nouns or adverbs Tomorrow is my brother's birthday makes it the noun Tomorrow, it is my brother's birthday makes it the adverb There is a subtle difference in nuance
|
|
|