|
- Usage between to and and - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
The second sentence is more explicit that buying milk was the purpose for which you went to the mall You can see this because it makes sense to say "I went to the mall and bought some milk, though I was planning to buy something else instead", but it would be self-contradictory to say "I went to the mall to buy some milk, though I was planning to buy something else instead "
- To the extent that means if or when?
Here's the explanation of to the extent of in Cambridge Dictionary: to a particular degree or stage, often causing particular results This meaning makes perfect sense in the following example sen
- Through or to? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
I would like to compare through and to What is their difference in meaning? Which one is (more) correct (or are both correct)? The context can be found in the two sentences below Julie went to sc
- to+verb vs to+be+verb-ing - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
With action verbs: I go to school in Miami [present simple] I'm going to school in Miami [present progressive as future or present situation] I'd like to go to school in Miami I'd like to be going to school in Miami Explanation: Continuous infinitive The continuous infinitive is used to express a continuing action after a verb or auxiliary which must be followed by the infinitive The
- prepositions - Difference between with and to - English Language . . .
"With" and "to" are very important prepositions in the English language I know the usage of both prepositions but some points I become stuck with when should I use which prepos
- word difference - to versus in order to - English Language Learners . . .
in order to communicates purpose or intent rather than timing You can simply use to instead, and your sentence will be correct, but in order to makes explicit the actor's reasoning for performing the first action
- infinitives - When we should add to before verb? - English Language . . .
Generally, the question of whether to use the infinitive with "to" or the infinitive without "to" depends on the particular word (verb, adjective, noun) which commands the phrase, and you just have to learn that For example, modals, such as should, must, take an infinitive without "to", while verbs like ought, have (to) require the "to", even though they mean pretty much the same: I should go
- grammar - will have to , have to and have had to - English . . .
I can’t understand and distinguish the necessity of using “will have to” instead of “have to” I think both are giving the same meaning and both are giving an indefinite hint of future For example
|
|
|