|
- c# - Return in catch block? - Stack Overflow
Putting a return in a catch block might be hard to read because you expect the return to bypass the finally statement The same could be said of putting a return block in the try block
- Exception handling try catch inside catch - Stack Overflow
I recently came across code written by a fellow programmer in which he had a try-catch statement inside a catch! Please forgive my inability to paste the actual code, but what he did was something
- Fetch: reject promise and catch the error if status is not OK?
As fetch only catch the network errors in the catch block, its better to use Axios which catch both the network errors and HTTP errors in catch block As simple as this:
- Exception thrown inside catch block - will it be caught again?
One related and confusing thing to know is that in a try- [catch]-finally structure, a finally block may throw an exception and if so, any exception thrown by the try or catch block is lost That can be confusing the first time you see it
- PowerShell try catch finally - Stack Overflow
write-host 'CommandNotFoundException' } catch { write-host 'well, darn' } That output 'CommandNotFoundException' correctly I vaguely remember reading elsewhere (though I couldn't find it again) of problems with this In such cases where exception filtering didn't work correctly, they would catch the closest Type they could and then use a switch
- Can I catch multiple Java exceptions in the same catch clause?
NoSuchFieldException e) { someCode(); } Remember, though, that if all the exceptions belong to the same class hierarchy, you can simply catch that base exception type Also note that you cannot catch both ExceptionA and ExceptionB in the same block if ExceptionB is inherited, either directly or indirectly, from ExceptionA The compiler will
- Use a try-finally block without a catch block - Stack Overflow
0 1 we can use the try block without catch but we should use the catch finally, any one of them 2 We can't use only try block
|
|
|