|
- How to resolve Unneccessary Stubbing exception - Stack Overflow
Unnecessary stubbings detected in test class: Test Clean maintainable test code requires zero unnecessary code Following stubbings are unnecessary (click to navigate to relevant line of code): 1 -> at service Test testDoSearch(Test java:72) Please remove unnecessary stubbings or use 'silent' option
- java - Unnecessary @SuppressWarnings (unused) - Stack Overflow
In the code in your question, the @SuppressWarnings("unused") annotation is unnecessary because the method is either overriding another method from a superclass or implementing an interface
- IDE0005 not reported as build failure even with . . .
<PropertyGroup> <TreatWarningsAsErrors>true< TreatWarningsAsErrors> <StyleCopTreatErrorsAsWarnings>false< StyleCopTreatErrorsAsWarnings> <EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>true< EnforceCodeStyleInBuild> <GenerateDocumentationFile>true< GenerateDocumentationFile> < PropertyGroup> And it fails the build when there any unnecessary usings
- Getting IDE0079 (Remove unnecessary suppression) to play well with . . .
But doing so will cause an IDE0079 warning, "Remove unnecessary suppression" Just like ND1212, I don't want to turn off IDE0079 in general either, but I do want to turn it off in this specific instance
- java - How to deal with Mockitos . . . - Stack Overflow
And if you are fine with unnecessary definitions of mock behavior because some of the arguments of the parameterized test will lead to the mock being called while others won't, lenient would be the way to go
- Is there a simple way to remove unused dependencies from a maven pom . . .
370 I have a large Maven project with many modules and many pom xml files The project has changed and I suspect the pom's contain some unnecessary dependencies Is there is a command which removes any unused dependencies from a pom?
- java - UnnecessaryStubbingException: Unnecessary stubbings detected . . .
The way the unnecessary stubbing detection works is by, for each test case, calculating which stubbings were provided and which were required If those 2 things are different, it will throw You seem to be under the impression that Mockito should understand which stubbings were specifically provided in setup, and consider them separately
- Why in Spring @Autowired annotation on a constructor is no longer . . .
However, if several constructors are available, at least one must be annotated to teach the container which one to use " I wander what happen under the hood in Spring framework to make @Autowired annotation unnecessary if it has just one constructor and why? Also why that not happen in case of multiple constructor?
|
|
|