|
- Does the verb “unpublish” exist? - English Language Usage Stack . . .
In the conventional sense, unpublished means "not yet published" rather than "withdrawn from publication" Therefore using "unpublish" as a verb to mean "withdraw from publication" sounds fairly odd to me
- Correct term to describe an unpublished research paper?
I'm planning on putting my research paper on my resume, but it is currently unpublished I've sent it to a publication journal and it's currently under formal review (not accepted yet) I don't wan
- Words for distinguishing between published official papers and . . .
0 Imagine that one wanted to present a list of (a) published academic papers and theses, and (b) unpublished papers and or essays (I'm not sure if there is a real difference between these two concepts) Which headings would make most sense to separate the two? Papers and essays? Official papers and unofficial papers?
- Is the term everyday people derogatory? [closed]
I came across the term 'everyday people' in an unpublished essay It strikes me as derogatory just because it is referring to people rather than to things and makes them appear common But then the
- Should foreign titles be capitalized according to English rules?
Titles of works cited must follow English rules: italics for published books and titles of journals, roman quoted [that is, regular nonitalic text placed within quotation marks] for articles in journals and unpublished dissertations Capitalization, however, follows the rules for the language of the title
- What did Tolkien apparently have against commas?
The form of the will is in "legalese", which, for reasons of tradition, abhors commas It is more than likely that the terms of the will were discussed between Tolkien and the drafter and the drafter wrote Tolkien's wishes out in a way that the probate department or a court (or whoever) would approve of It says nothing of Tolkien's use of commas
- Use of a dash at the end of sentence after terminal punctuation
Given that we're dealing with a known work from the '50s by a highly regarded architect and theorist, changes are not on the table in the way they would be as a fresh edit of an unpublished work It's clearly out of step with any convention, however, to use a standard em-dash here, and the feel to this case—the intended meaning—seems very much like a trailing-off ellipsis Perhaps a
- Much more easy versus much easier - English Language Usage Stack . . .
There is a excellent paper where doubly marked comparatives and superlatives are discussed at length - Solomon, G 1994 A more closer look at comparatives and superlatives Unpublished paper UCLA
|
|
|