|
- word choice - Approach to or approach for - English Language . . .
The reason to ask this question is an argument with my friend: what's right, approach to caching or approach for caching? (Caching in the software engineering sense) (But I'd like to hear more general answer )
- A good and scientific way of saying holistic approach or holistic . . .
I am struggling to write the introduction of a scientific journal paper because it is absurdly novel I am trying to show the community that we have approaches in different domains that need to be
- Train approaching - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
Is it correct? It's the message I see right before the metro subway train shows up Shouldn't it be "train is approaching" or "train approaches"?
- writing style - Emphasising that a date is near - English Language . . .
What is a good way to emphasise that a particular date is near or coming very close? For example, suppose today is the 22 of May and there is the submission date for a project is on the 25 of May I
- Where should the apostrophe go on a possessive abbreviation?
It seems to me that either of these latter two approaches is superior to either of the earlier two approaches because the latter two approaches are internally consistent and don't call attention to themselves in a distracting way, as the earlier two approaches do
- It is worth mentioning versus it is worth to mention
What’s the right way to use the phrase it is worth? Which of the following two approaches is right, and how they are different? It is worth mentioning that [ ] It is worth to mention that [ ]
- Wholistic vs holistic - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
This reference states: The two words "wholistic" and "holistic" have very different meanings, but there is some confusion and they are often used in an incorrect manner The two words have very
- logic - Neither can live while the other survives-- does it make . . .
You're correct, it is indeed contradictory Taken purely logically, then, if neither can live while the other survives, then if Harry is alive Voldemort must be dead and if Voldemort is alive Harry must be dead Since we know both Harry and Voldemort are alive, the statement is clearly false Since the statement is part of a piece that refers to them as alive, and one killing the other, then
|
|
|