copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
HTTP Status code 202 vs 200 for a POST request - Stack Overflow The main purpose of using 202 instead of 200 is for a server to communicate to a client: "From what I can tell, the request looks good However, we haven't fully dealt with your request yet and we aren't 100% certain it's going to succeed" So if someone does a request, the server immediately responds and then forwards the request elsewhere, a 202 makes sense to me If the request fails at the
Use http status 202 for asynchronous operations - Stack Overflow 49 I think that your solution is fine, the Http status 202 is the proper response to use in this specific case indicating that the request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has not been completed What I would slightly change in your workflow are the Http status of the subsequent requests
Is it wrong to return 202 Accepted in response to HTTP GET? Otherwise, a 202 "Accepted" status code is returned, and the client must poll the resource until the final representation is available The reason for this behavior is the following: If a result is available within a few seconds, it needs to be retrieved as soon as possible; otherwise, when it becomes available is not important
python - HTTP status code 200 vs 202 - Stack Overflow The 202 response is intentionally non-committal Its purpose is to allow a server to accept a request for some other process (perhaps a batch-oriented process that is only run once per day) without requiring that the user agent's connection to the server persist until the process is completed
Is the use of Location header in HTTP 202 response RFC-compliant? Return HTTP status code 202 (Accepted) to indicate the request was accepted for processing but is not completed You should expose an endpoint that returns the status of an asynchronous request, so the client can monitor the status by polling the status endpoint Include the URI of the status endpoint in the Location header of the 202 response
rest - Is HTTP status 202 appropriate for account creation, while . . . The 202 response is intentionally noncommittal Its purpose is to allow a server to accept a request for some other process (perhaps a batch-oriented process that is only run once per day) without requiring that the user agent's connection to the server persist until the process is completed
HTTP status code for update and delete? - Stack Overflow For a DELETE request: HTTP 200 or HTTP 204 should imply "resource deleted successfully" HTTP 202 can also be returned by either operation and would imply that the instruction was accepted by the server, but not fully applied yet It's possible that the operation fails later, so the client shouldn't fully assume that it was success