copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
HTTP response code for POST when resource already exists My feeling is 409 Conflict is the most appropriate, however, seldom seen in the wild of course: The request could not be completed due to a conflict with the current state of the resource This code is only allowed in situations where it is expected that the user might be able to resolve the conflict and resubmit the request The response body SHOULD include enough information for the user to
Excel Number Format: What is [$-409]? - Stack Overflow The [$-409] is a locale code, given in hexadecimal Prefixing a date with a certain locale code determines what is shown when you use the various date time format codes
Is returning HTTP 409 appropriate for a validation check? It's obvious that a successful validation will return a 200 OK But I don't feel that a success status code is appropriate for a validation failure I'm leaning towards a 409 Conflict, but I've only ever used this to reject a PUT or POST Is it valid (snicker) to have a validation failure indicated by a 409, or is there a better way?
rest - What to return with a 409 conflict? - Stack Overflow If the user is already registered by that email, I'll return a 409 CONFLICT status However, I'm not quite sure what the proper content is required to return with that -- for example, do I return that user object?
Distinguishing HTTP status code 403 and 409 in practice (or 400) Even after reading many documents, books, spec I couldn't 100% be certain whether I should use http status code 403 or 409 in my case Some argue that 403 should be used only with an authorization
deployment - maven deploy:deploy-file fails (409 Conflict), yet . . . I have a project in Jenkins where I use the promotion plugin to deploy my artifacts in Maven via the deploy:deploy-file goal This works for several other projects I have in Maven, but it fails for this project The funny thing is that the file (but not the pom xml) uploads anyway I've verified this by removing the artifact from our Maven repository, then running the promotion The artifact
422 or 409 status code for existing email during signup I think 409 is most appropriate in this described example as the request is conflicting with an already existing registration For example, if the service couldn't accept a de domain based email address; 422 seems preferable