copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Which preposition is used with accommodating: to for If you are trying to say people will be will to do things accommodating to accommodating towards might be used accommodating for might not have a meaning you are not, except in certain parts of Amsterdam
Accommodate vs accommodate for - English Language Learners Stack Exchange "accommodate vs accommodate for" “Accommodate” without “for” is commonly used Adding “for” specifies a reason behind the accommodation In English, both “accommodate” and “accommodate for” can be correct, but they serve different purposes When you want to talk about making room or adjusting something to fit needs, use “accommodate” alone For example: The hotel can
One word for very helpful - English Language Learners Stack Exchange The word accommodating doesn't incorporate the intensifier, though it's a good word Consider that you can say "You have been very accommodating " A word that won't accept an additional intensifier is indispensable It's not exactly the same as helpful, but it might fit some situations
Can I use accommodating as an opposite of dominating? "accommodating" (considerate · friendly · generous · helpful · hospitable · polite · unselfish · obliging ) isn't really the opposite of "dominating domineering" (imperative, imperious, masterful, peremptory, ) By and large, we only use "accommodating" to refer to the senior party in an interaction (who has the power to refuse whatever the junior party wants, but chooses not to
american english - The confusion about the word accommodation . . . Accommodation as a place to stay is uncountable in BrE According to Macmillan Dictionary, accommodations (always plural) in AmE can mean the same thing So in BrE and AmE, it's either accommodation or accommodations An accommodation in the news (CNN) seems to be an act of accommodating, I believe
In a CV - I taught vs I was teaching vs I had been teaching In the context of your CV, you are explaining things that you did Simple past (your third example) is best, because you are not attempting to place your statement in a time context with another statement Look at these: I was teaching my students when the fire alarm rang and we had to leave the building I had been teaching for five years by the time I turned 25 I taught academic oral
grammar - (A) burden (to on) someone - English Language Learners . . . Either "burden" or "burdens" fits It's a question of how the speaker is thinking of them, and I don't see any reason to choose one over the other, given just that sentence As to the prepositions, saying "They are a burden on me " is a simple statement about how they weigh on me Saying "They are a burden to me " is a statement about how I regard them, that is, what they mean to me The