copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
R. C. Poudyal v. Union of India - lawbhoomi. com R C Poudyal v Union of India is a landmark judgement delivered in 1994 that dealt with the constitutional validity of special electoral and representation provisions introduced for the State of Sikkim
R. C. Poudyal v. Union of India, 1994 Supp (1) SCC 324 The Supreme Court noted that Article 2 of the Constitution of India, 1950 grants flexible powers to Parliament regarding the admission of new states, subject to judicial review
R. C. Poudyal And Anr. Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors. Etc. Etc on . . . Further, some special provisions were made in a newly added Article 371F, and strong reliance has been placed on behalf of the respondents on the provisions of clause (f) in Article 371F as authorising the impugned amended provisions in the Representation of the People Acts
RC Poudyal V Union Of India : Landmark Case - Testbook. com The RC Poudyal v Union of India judgment upheld Article 371F, ensuring Sikkim's integration while preserving its cultural identity, balancing equality with special provisions, and promoting political stability
R. C. Poudyal vs. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 1804 - LawFoyer Referring to Articles 2 and 4 of the Constitution, it was contended that admission into the Union of India is permissible without a constitutional amendment and the terms and conditions of such admission are not open to court’s scrutiny
The Case of RC Poudyal vs Union of India (1993) - Jyoti Judiciary The 1976 and 1980 Acts’ provisions, which reserved 12 seats for Sikkimese of Bhutia and Lepcha descent and one seat for Sanghas, were contested on the grounds that they violated Articles 332, 14, 15, and 325 and fell outside of Article 371F
R. C. Poudyal v. Union of India: A Simple Guide to India’s . . . What does R C Poudyal v Union of India mean for India’s Constitution? Doon Law Mentor offers a simple guide for law students and lawyers, analyzing the 1994 case on Sikkim’s integration, Article 371F, and constitutional flexibility Explore key issues, judgments, and lessons for legal practice
R. C. Poudyal vs. Union of India (1994) Summary for UPSC Polity Notes The R C Poudyal vs Union of India case in 1994 is a significant judgment that dealt with the constitutionality of certain provisions regarding the political structure and representation in the State of Sikkim, especially after its merger with India
Case Commentary on R. C. Poudyal v. Union of India The case focuses on the constitutional validity of the reservations made by the Parliament in the state of Sikkim and determines the concerns related to such representations