copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Whats the difference between and amp; in HTML5? In HTML5, they are equivalent in that example Traditionally, in HTML, only amp; was correct — but as with so many things, web developers blithely ignored this inconvenient rule and wrote bare ampersands everywhere For their part, browsers just "did the right thing" and interpreted these ampersands as ampersands HTML5 standardized this behavior, so now is allowed by itself as long as
forms - What is amp used for - Stack Overflow So you should be replacing your ampersands with amp; when writing a URL in your markup Note that replacing with amp; is only done when writing the URL in HTML, where " " is a special character (along with "<" and ">")
Do I really need to encode as - Stack Overflow Encoding as amp; under all circumstances, for me, is an easier rule to live by, reducing the likelihood of errors and failures Compare the following: which is easier? Which is easier to bugger up? Methodology 1 Write some content which includes ampersand characters Encode them all Methodology 2 (with a grain of salt, please ;) )
URL encode sees “ ” (ampersand) as “ amp;” HTML entity amp; is the proper way to escape the ampersand in an HTML context where is your source coming from? and what's the destination? It may be better to do this server-side for example
javascript - Why should I use instead of ? - Stack Overflow 15 why should I use amp; instead of when writing HTML for my site? Where can I find a list of other symbols that I should be encoding? (the bar too, right?) What problems could I have if I paste the symbol right as it is into the html?
How can I include an ampersand ( ) character in an XML document? The ampersand character ( ) and the left angle bracket (<) MUST NOT appear in their literal form, except when used as markup delimiters, or within a comment, a processing instruction, or a CDATA section If they are needed elsewhere, they MUST be escaped using either numeric character references or the strings " amp; " and " lt; " respectively
xml - Is amp; valid - Stack Overflow 12 amp;amp; is "valid", though whether you want to use it is another question If you're writing a document in XML, then amp; will be used to represent an ampersand If your XML document is describing content that itself is encoded in a similar way -- e g HTML -- then that content could logically include an amp; itself
Ampersand is being HTML Encoded as amp;. Any way to prevent this? The only way that the amp; should be showing on the page is if you're double encoding the ampersand character (so the source of the page would be showing amp;amp;) This could be caused by either storing the character already HTML encoded or you're using <%: (which HTML encodes everything for you automatically) instead of <%= in your View