copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Apprendi v. New Jersey - Wikipedia New Jersey, 530 U S 466 (2000), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision with regard to aggravating factors in crimes
Apprendi v. New Jersey | 530 U. S. 466 (2000) | Justia U. S . . . Apprendi v New Jersey: Criminal sentences cannot be enhanced above the limits provided by statute unless the jury finds the existence of the specific aggravating factors giving rise to the enhancement beyond a reasonable doubt
Apprendi v. New Jersey | Oyez Apprendi was charged under New Jersey law with second-degree possession of a firearm for an unlawful purpose, which carries a prison term of 5 to 10 years
Argument recap: Just what does Apprendi mean? - SCOTUSblog In Apprendi, the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial means that any fact that leads to a sentence longer than the maximum spelled out in law must be found to exist by the jury, applying the rigorous legal standard, beyond a reasonable doubt
Apprendi, Punishment, and a Retroactive Theory of Revocation Revisiting the Apprendi cases and their contemporary scholarly treatment reveals that the doctrine was rooted not in novel methods of textual interpretation, but in fundamental principles of substantive criminal law: what constitutes “crime” and “punishment ”
Clarifying Apprendi: How Erlinger v. United States Reinforces . . . With Erlinger, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the fundamental constitutional protection first articulated in Apprendi: sentencing enhancements based on factual determinations must be made by a jury, not a judge, and found beyond a reasonable doubt