copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
People v. Rogers :: 2025 :: California Courts of Appeal Decisions . . . In 1998, a jury convicted Rogers of three counts of robbery and one count of false imprisonment The trial court found the prior conviction allegations true and sentenced Rogers to three consecutive terms of 25 years to life, plus additional time for enhancements Rogers's appeal was denied
People v. Rogers | Constitutional Law and Rights - Lumen Learning We hold today that once an attorney has entered the proceeding, thereby signifying that the police should cease questioning a defendant in custody may not be further interrogated in the absence of counsel
People v Rogers (2023 NY Slip Op 06546) Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny K Chun, J ), dated April 22, 2021, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements
PEOPLE v. ROGERS | 48 N. Y. 2d 167 | N. Y. | Judgment | Law - CaseMine Since defendant's plea of guilty to burglary in satisfaction of another indictment was entered upon an agreement that the sentence imposed would run concurrently with the sentence imposed on the robbery conviction, the plea should be vacated (People v Clark, 45 N Y 2d 432)
People v. Rogers - Case Law - VLEX 885808746 We hold today that once an attorney has entered the proceeding, thereby signifying that the police should cease questioning a defendant in custody may not be further interrogated in the absence of counsel
People v Rogers :: 2025 :: New York Appellate Division, Second . . . Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Laura R Johnson, J ), rendered June 6, 2022, convicting him of criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed
People v. Rogers (2006) – Case Brief Summary (California) | Lawpipe In People v Rogers (2006) the trial court gave two general instructions on murder plus a specific instruction on willful, deliberate and premeditated first degree murder and CALJIC No 8 31, which instructed the jury on second degree implied malice murder
People v Rogers (2005 NY Slip Op 02079) Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Peter L Broderick, Sr , J ), rendered April 5, 2001 The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree