copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
What are the essential differences between the BSD and MIT licences? In addition the MIT license also explicitly allows: However, all these freedoms are implied by the BSD license, because all these activities can be considered "use" and or "redistribution" of the software The practical differences between the 2-clause BSD license and the MIT license are marginal Which one to pick is mostly up to personal taste
What are the practical differences between MIT, Apache and BSD licenses? @JamesMcLeod, although the MIT license is under 200 words, I think reading it and understanding all its implications are very different things I feel like the Apache 2 0 patent clause makes it clear that the situation for the MIT license is complex, even if it's short
What is this shortened, BSD-3-Clause-like license? The disclaimer at the end is given a header and is dramatically shortened and simplified I've tried searching for a bunch of different permissive licenses, tried to look for anything called "simplified BSD-3-Clause" or "modified BSD-3-Clause", and plugged the full text of the license directly into Google, all without success
Patent rights: BSD-3-Clause-Clear vs BSD-3-Clause My understanding was that it added additional protections to BSD-3 licence against potential malicious patent bullying trolls As in, if you use or modify code licensed under the BSD-3-Clause-Clear, you would not be able to patent that modified code (and by extension, enforce that patent against other derivations or contributors)
How does the 3-clause BSD license apply to LaTeX and PDFs? The BSD 3-clause license does not require attribution However, if I choose to make attribution, say, in the README of my repository, could that be interpreted as using the name of the author to promote my own work, and violate clause 3?
BSD 3-Clause: where to place license for binary installation? 9 We want to publish a project that does use some components under BSD-3-Clause license according to below: Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and or other materials provided with the distribution
Conditions on binaries incorporating BSD 3-clause licensed code 3 I have developed a software that uses (is statically linked to) code licensed under BSD 3-clause license Just reading the license terms, it seems to me that I'm obliged to allow any one who I sell (redistribute) my software to, to have the right to use the whole software under the conditions of BSD 3-clause license