copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
CSR Initiatives to Strengthen Peer Review | NIH Center for Scientific . . . NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR)CSR developed training specifically targeted toward mitigating the most common biases in the peer review process The training includes personal testimonials, interactive exercises, and a narrated mock study section demonstrating techniques to intervene – all based on real-life examples The training was developed with the assistance of the CSR Advisory
Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and . . . Hall et al (47) published a systematic literature review of 15 studies designed to explore the evidence of provider implicit racial bias and health outcomes In the studies measuring prevalence, rates of anti-Black bias in health care providers ranged from 42% to 100%
Working toward reducing bias in peer review - PMC While we believe that these actions will help reduce peer reviewer bias in ASBMB journals, we realize that they fall short of resolving it Going forward, we will be regularly reviewing demographic and other data that relate to our peer review communities and continue to work toward reducing all aspects of bias
Moving towards less biased research - PMC Scrutiny begins by noting that peer review is meant to detect rather than prevent bias One perhaps could counter that peer review actually is a hybrid countermeasure since it is capable of actually preventing bias at times, or at the least the dissemination of reports tainted by it since, when peer review works, it can prevent publication of
Identifying and Avoiding Bias in Research - PMC This narrative review provides an overview on the topic of bias as part of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery's series of articles on evidence-based medicine Bias can occur in the planning, data collection, analysis, and publication phases of
NIH will eliminate many peer-review panels and lay off some . . . - AAAS The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is centralizing its system for vetting research proposals Starting later this year, its Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will take over all reviewing responsibilities from the multiple bodies now involved, the agency announced yesterday Currently CSR reviews 78% of grant submissions, or 66,000 applications a year, with panels run by NIH’s separate
Eliminating bias living with bias? - PMC This unsettling thought was raised by Emerson et al (full disclosure: some of the authors are fellow employees at the University of Washington) in their recent article titled “Testing for a positive outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial ”
CSR Launches Competition for Ideas to Detect Bias and Maximize Fairness . . . The other challenge, Strategies to Strengthen Fairness and Impartiality in Peer Review, seeks ideas for reviewer training methods aimed at enhancing fairness and impartiality in NIH peer review The submission does not require the full development of training materials
Bias in the Peer Review Process: Can We Do Better? - PubMed Abstract Peer review is the major method used by the scientific community to evaluate manuscripts and decide what is suitable for publication However, this process in its current design is not bulletproof and is prone to reviewer and editorial bias Its lack of objectivity and transparency raise concerns that manuscripts might be judged based on interests irrelevant to the content itself and