copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
CRISPR in Public Health: The Health Equity Implications and . . . However, CRISPR’s public health implications remain relatively uncertain and underdiscussed because (1) targeting genetic factors alone will have limited influence on population health, and (2) minority populations (racial ethnic, sexual and gender)—who bear the nation’s greatest health burdens—historically suffer unequal benefits from
Justice in CRISPR Cas9 Research and Clinical Applications We describe justice concerns related to CRISPR Cas9, including its potential impact on historically mistreated populations through underrepresentation of minorities in genomic databases and the potential for disparate access to somatic gene therapies when they become clinically available
Naming and Responding to Structural Racism in Health Care While some may feel discouraged by emerging threats to health equity efforts, this special issue affirms work toward addressing structural racism The contents offer clarity that may help future efforts to dismantle unjust structures The investments may benefit impacted communities, health care institutions, and the United States and other
Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of CRISPR Use in Humans Not all populations have equal access to medical advancements, and CRISPR is no exception Access barriers can stem from economic reasons, with wealthier individuals or communities able to afford experimental therapies Cultural factors may influence who benefits from CRISPR applications
Benefits and Ethical Concerns of CRISPR – Pros and Cons While the benefits of CRISPR range from curing genetic conditions to organ transplants, ethicists fear its use in promoting desired traits rather than life-saving traits such as intelligence that could have long-term implications
The Use and Access to CRISPR in Historically . . . Accepting the premise that CRISPR-mediated gene editing in humans will occur in the future, we present an anticipatory analysis of the ethical viability of CRISPR concerning future stakeholders We show that pluralist universalism, which holds social justice and
CRISPR in Public Health: The Health Equity Implications and . . . From a health equity perspective, although CRISPR may significantly advance science and health care, gene-editing technologies concurrently raise serious concerns about fairness, justice, and access for minority populations