copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Why Isnt 1 a Prime Number? : r math - Reddit The author forgot to mention that the fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that every number greater than 1 is either a prime number or can be represented as a unique product of primes
1705542 is a prime number : r badmathematics - Reddit Episode 2: I found a flaw in the Riemann hypothesis and can prove that 1705549 is a prime number How can I publish my proof? 1705549 is a prime number, but this doesn't have any implication for the Riemann hypothesis
To generate prime numbers : r numbertheory - Reddit To generate prime numbers Introduction: Prime numbers are one of the most well explored part of number theory The method presented here on prime number generation is both intriguing and exciting This method shows both,the properties of prime numbers and gives us a way to generate exponential prime numbers faster than any algorithm in existence
Why isnt negative one considered a prime number? : r math - Reddit Usually number theory is concerned only with positive integers This is why negative numbers are not usually included in the list of primes From an algebraic perspective, −1 is a unit in the ring of integers (along with 1), and units are excluded from being primes Negative integers such as −2, −3, −5, −7, −11, and so on are prime elements of the ring of integers (they are also
Whats the usefulness of finding new bigger prime numbers? Nonetheless, you are right on the fact that using this Mersenne's prime method, a lot of primes are left behind before reaching 31, meaning if keep finding bigger prime numbers by this method, eventually, a lot of unknown prime numbers will be left behind in-between the smaller we already now, and the big ones we are discovering
ELI5: Why isnt 1 a prime number? : r explainlikeimfive - Reddit A prime number needs to have exactly two regular-old-number (natural numbers) divisors--itself, and 1 1 only has a single natural divisor: 1 It's sad that 1 doesn't get to be prime, but, hey: you must have at least two unique natural divisors to get on this ride
eli5 How does Euclids theorem prove that there are infinite prime . . . The theorem itself doesn't prove anything -- it's just a mathematical statement There is a famous proof of Euclid's Theorem that works by contradiction: It assumes that are only a finite number of prime numbers, and then shows that if there are only a finite number of primes, then you end up with an untrue statement