copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. CTR. , 64 NY 2d 851 - Scribd Winegrad v New York Univ Med Ctr , 64 NY 2d 851 - NY- Court of Appeals 1985 - - Free download as PDF File ( pdf), Text File ( txt) or read online for free The plaintiffs sued several doctors for medical malpractice
Vol. 63 of New York Reports (N. Y. 2d) – CourtListener. com Create alerts, search for and browse the latest case law, PACER documents, judges, and oral arguments Updated automatically with the latest court documents An initiative of Free Law Project
Legal Memorandum: Summary Judgment Standard in NY Issue: What factors are to be considered when attempting to meet the standard for summary judgment in New York? As a threshold matter, a defendant moving for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issue of fact Winegrad v
Supreme Court, Kings County, Denies Unopposed Motion for Summary . . . As explained in prior Blog articles, a court will grant a motion for summary judgment if, upon all the papers and evidence submitted, the cause of action or defense is established sufficiently to warrant directing judgment in favor of the moving party as a matter of law