copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
1988 CanLII 45 (SCC) | Crocker v. Sundance Northwest Resorts Ltd. | CanLII Respondent, as a promotion for its ski resort, held a competition which involved two‑person teams sliding down a mogulled portion of a steep hill in oversized inner tubes Appellant entered the competition, signed the entry and waiver form without reading it and paid the entry fee
Summary of Crocker v. Sundance Northwest Resorts Ltd. Sundance owed Crocker a duty because of the likely and foreseeable risk of harm resulting from its operation of a competition for profit in a dangerous sport A reasonable organization should have taken steps to dissuade Crocker from competing
Case in focus: Lessons from Crocker v. Sundance | Lexpert Completely cited as Crocker v Sundance Northwest Resorts Ltd , [1988] 1 SCR 1186, this is a historical and significant tort case in Canada To summarize, the case involved a skier (Crocker) who filed a case against a ski resort (Sundance), which organized a “tubing” competition
Crocker v. Sundance Northwest Resorts Ltd. , ( (1988), 86 N. R. 241 (SCC . . . Crocker sued the defendant ski resort which promoted and organized the race The trial judge held the ski resort liable and 75% at fault (see 43 O R (2d) 145) Crocker appealed respecting the damages assessed for his personal injuries The ski resort cross-appealed on the question of liability
Supreme Court of Canada | 19590 - scc-csc. ca William Crocker v Sundance Northwest Resorts Limited Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous
Crocker v. Sundance Northwest Resorts Ltd. - SCC Cases This page contains a form to search the Supreme Court of Canada case information database You can search by the SCC 5-digit case number, by name or word in the style of cause, or by file number from the appeal court
Crocker v. Sundance Northwest Resorts Ltd. , (1988) 29 O. A. C. 1 (SCC) Crocker sued the defendant ski resort which promoted and organized the race The trial judge held the ski resort liable and 75% at fault (see 43 O R (2d) 145) Crocker appealed respecting the damages assessed for his personal injuries The ski resort cross-appealed on the question of liability
Crocker versus Sundance Assignment - Hospitality Law TORTS AND . . . The Ontario Court of Appeal, with one judge in dissent, found in favour of the resort At this level (the Supreme Court of Canada), Crocker is the Appellant Plaintiff and Sundance Resorts is the Respondent Defendant