copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Cliburn v. One Source to Market, LLC d b a Hexclad Cookware, Inc. A settlement has been proposed in a class action lawsuit against One Source to Market, LLC d b a Hexclad Cookware, Inc (“HexClad”), which alleged HexClad falsely advertised, labeled, and marketed the non-stick coating of certain of its products, including, but not limited to, claims that the products were “non-toxic,” “PFAS Free,” “PFOA Free,” or otherwise free from certain
HexClad $2. 5M Cookware False Advertising Settlement Why was there a class action lawsuit? The class action lawsuit alleged HexClad Cookware falsely advertised, labeled and marketed certain products as nontoxic, PFAS-free, PFOA-free or otherwise free from certain chemicals The plaintiffs claimed these representations were misleading and violated consumer protection and false advertising laws
HexClad Pans Lawsuit Update, $2. 5M Settlement Hearing Rescheduled to . . . The HexClad pans lawsuit final approval hearing has been rescheduled to February 10, 2026, pushing back the originally scheduled September 2025 date HexClad agreed to pay $2 5 million to resolve claims that it falsely advertised its cookware as “PFAS Free,” “PFOA Free,” or “non-toxic” when the products allegedly contain
HexClad Cookware Non-Stick $2. 5M False Advertising Settlement HexClad denies all allegations of wrongdoing, but has resolved the class action even though the class action claimed that HexClad falsely advertised, labeled, and marketed the non-stick coating of certain cookware products What is the Total Settlement Amount? HexClad has agreed to pay $2,500,000 into a Settlement Fund How Do I Qualify For a