copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Assn - Wikipedia FERC v Electric Power Supply Ass'n, 577 U S 260 (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had the authority to regulate demand response transactions [1]
14-840 FERC v. Electric Power Supply Assn. (01 25 2016) EPSA’s arguments suggest that the entire practice of wholesale demand re-sponse falls outside what FERC can regulate, and EPSA concedes that States also lack that authority
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply . . . - Oyez A case in which the Court held that the Federal Power Act (FPA) grants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the authority to regulate wholesale market operators’ compensation for reduction in electricity consumption, and the rule in question was not arbitrary and capricious
FERC v. EPSA - Vanderbilt University In upholding the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) rules to encourage participation of de-mand response resources in wholesale demand power markets, the Court ended an ongoing battle surrounding compensation of demand response providers
FERC V. EPSA AND THE PATH TO A CLEANER ELECTRICITY SECTOR FERC validated the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) rule that undergirds modern wholesale electricity markets 2 This January, in a 6–2 decision authored by Justice Elena Kagan, the Court held that FERC has authority over “demand response” (“DR”)—bids of reductions in electricity consumption into wholesale markets3
EPSA Joins Petitioners Appealing FERC Order Eliminating Reactive Power . . . Summary: The Electric Power Supply Association joined seven other parties to appeal FERC’s Order No 904, a final rule categorically eliminating compensation for electric generators providing reactive power within the standard power factor range (issued October 17, 2024; Docket No RM22-2-000, 001)
FERC v. EPSA and the Path to a Cleaner Electricity Sector This article analyzes the impact of FERC v Electric Power Supply Association, in which the Supreme Court upheld FERC’s demand response rule (Order 745) and confirmed FERC’s authority over “practices” “directly affecting” wholesale rates for electricity
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply . . . The FPA provides FERC with the authority to regulate wholesale market operators' compensation of demand response bids because the practices at issue directly affect wholesale rates, FERC has not regulated retail sales, and the contrary view would conflict with the FPA's core purposes