copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
*. h or *. hpp for your C++ headers class definitions another convention is to use h for C headers and hpp for C++; a good example would be the boost library Quote from Boost FAQ, File extensions communicate the "type" of the file, both to humans and to computer programs The ' h' extension is used for C header files, and therefore communicates the wrong thing about C++ header files
Should I include lt;xxxx. h gt; or lt;cxxxx gt; in C++ programs? -1 re "we are not polluting the global namespace", you have just quoted and discussed that this is not the case so a bit of self-contradiction it is important because it directly affects the conclusion of what is best practice your conclusion above is wrong it is weird you first discuss why it's a bad choice (possibility of code not working across compilers, unintended namespace
c++ - . c vs . cc vs. . cpp vs . hpp vs . h vs . cxx - Stack Overflow * h or * hpp for your class definitions What is the difference between cc and cpp file suffix? I used to think that it used to be that: h files are header files for C and C++, and usually only contain declarations c files are C source code cpp files are C++ source code (which can also be C source code)
c++ - #include in . h or . c . cpp? - Stack Overflow In callback h you should include everything needed to compile against it But nothing more But nothing more Consider whether using forward declarations in your header file (such as class GtkButton; ) will suffice, allowing you to reduce the number of #include directives in the header (and, in turn, my compilation time and complexity)